Keys out of order on page error

There are a couple of things.
Firstly it is very intensive so turn off as many services
you can get away with, i.e SQL Agent
Secondly depending upon the severity of the error it may
result in data loss. Personally I would try firstly with
REPAIR_FAST, then REPAIR_REBUILD and if all else fails
REPAIR_ALLOW_DATA_LOSS, its that option where you may lose
data.
If the REPAIR_ALLOW_DATA_LOSS doesn't work then you will
have to restore from backup.
As for the reason why to difficult to say.
Good luck
Peter

>--Original Message--
>We have found we have corruption in our db.
>After running DBCC CHECKDB the following error were
displayed on
>multiple pages.
>Server: Msg 2511, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
>Table error: Object ID 1285579618, Index ID 3. Keys out
of order on page
>(1:384662), slots 75 and 76.
>I read a post that suggested running DBCC CHECKDB with
the repair_build
>option.
>Since we are a 24/7 shop I cannot restore from tape,
because it would
>take several hours.
>What are the risks of running DBCC CHECKDB with the
repair_build option,
>and will this fix the problem properly?
>We are still unsure what has caused this corruption, any
body else have
>this problem?
>TIA,
>-Ben
>.
>In addition:
The latest update of Books Online has some very detailed recommendations for
most error numbers.
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Peter The Spate" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:374a01c47eee$f6a6a890$a501280a@.phx.gbl...[vbcol=seagreen]
> There are a couple of things.
> Firstly it is very intensive so turn off as many services
> you can get away with, i.e SQL Agent
> Secondly depending upon the severity of the error it may
> result in data loss. Personally I would try firstly with
> REPAIR_FAST, then REPAIR_REBUILD and if all else fails
> REPAIR_ALLOW_DATA_LOSS, its that option where you may lose
> data.
> If the REPAIR_ALLOW_DATA_LOSS doesn't work then you will
> have to restore from backup.
> As for the reason why to difficult to say.
> Good luck
> Peter
>
> displayed on
> of order on page
> the repair_build
> because it would
> repair_build option,
> body else have