Monday, March 19, 2012

Keyword "Over"

I've seen documentation for SQL Server that describes that 'over' is a reser
ved keyword. However, I can't find any examples, explanations, descriptions
, etc. for what this keyword does. Is this just a "reserverd for future use
" type of thing. Or, is th
ere some functionality associated with the keyword 'over'. If the latter, c
an someone point me in the right direction for finding more info.
thanks!
DaveHi Dave
It will be a keyword in the next version. Itzik Ben-Gan will be writing
about it very soon!
HTH
--
Kalen Delaney
SQL Server MVP
www.SolidQualityLearning.com
"Dave M" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F062DDA7-6414-47FE-82AD-FD058F52BD34@.microsoft.com...
> I've seen documentation for SQL Server that describes that 'over' is a
reserved keyword. However, I can't find any examples, explanations,
descriptions, etc. for what this keyword does. Is this just a "reserverd
for future use" type of thing. Or, is there some functionality associated
with the keyword 'over'. If the latter, can someone point me in the right
direction for finding more info.
> thanks!
> Dave|||Just to add a little bit to Kalen's post:
MS takes the proactive stance and documents keywords that might not be
keywords in the current version of SQL Server but are keywords in ANSI SQL.
Just in case MS decides to implement some language feature of the ANSI SQL
language in an upcoming release.
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
Archive at:
http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=...ublic.sqlserver
"Dave M" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F062DDA7-6414-47FE-82AD-FD058F52BD34@.microsoft.com...
> I've seen documentation for SQL Server that describes that 'over' is a
reserved keyword. However, I can't find any examples, explanations,
descriptions, etc. for what this keyword does. Is this just a "reserverd
for future use" type of thing. Or, is there some functionality associated
with the keyword 'over'. If the latter, can someone point me in the right
direction for finding more info.
> thanks!
> Dave

No comments:

Post a Comment